jwz - Boomerangs work in SPACE! [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
jwz

  www.jwz.org
  userinfo
  archive
  rss

Links
[»| DNA (Log) (iCal) WebCollage (LJ) Mixtapes ]

Boomerangs work in SPACE! [Thu, 1-May-2008 1:26 AM]
Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry
[Tags|, ]
[music |The Kills -- Alphabet Pony]

Who knew.
linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: [info]porphyre
Thu, 1-May-2008 8:29 AM (UTC)

(Link)

I hate to sound puerile, but that's Just So Cool!
[User Picture]From: [info]patrick
Thu, 1-May-2008 8:33 AM (UTC)

(Link)

I bet it works because of air resistance and gravity doesn't matter much.
[User Picture]From: [info]fatherbingo
Thu, 1-May-2008 3:27 PM (UTC)

(Link)

Thank you, Captain Obvious.
[User Picture]From: [info]carbonunit
Thu, 1-May-2008 10:23 AM (UTC)

(Link)

Correction: boomerangs work in a weightless environment with atmosphere. If it turned out they work in a vacuum by inertial effects, that would be cool, but this is no surprise. A propellor would work as well. A pogo stick would have problems.
[User Picture]From: [info]alana_ash
Thu, 1-May-2008 3:39 PM (UTC)

(Link)

Sir, why do you hate science space boomerangs?
[User Picture]From: [info]lohphat
Thu, 1-May-2008 5:14 PM (UTC)

Well...

(Link)

Because their first album was so retro.
[User Picture]From: [info]0jla
Fri, 2-May-2008 10:03 AM (UTC)

Re: Well...

(Link)

I lol'd.
From: [info]emtel
Sat, 10-May-2008 6:50 AM (UTC)

(Link)

If it turned out they worked in a vacuum, wouldn't that sort of, um, violate conservation of momentum?
[User Picture]From: [info]luserspaz
Thu, 1-May-2008 2:18 PM (UTC)

(Link)

I can't ever get them to work right on earth. :-/
[User Picture]From: [info]merovingian
Thu, 1-May-2008 2:44 PM (UTC)

(Link)

This is the best news of today.
[User Picture]From: [info]latemodel
Thu, 1-May-2008 2:55 PM (UTC)

(Link)

Now I'm sitting here trying to recall whether 'g' appeared in the page of equations we derived in my Advanced Classical Mechanics class in college. Suffice to say, even fully-vectorized, it's an ugly sheet of work.
[User Picture]From: [info]misterfister666
Thu, 1-May-2008 9:56 PM (UTC)

(Link)

I hope not. Because as the video demonstrates, g is irrelevant.

We worked out boomerangs in some class too, I remember, but I actually
recall it as being quite elegant. There's the spinning gyroscope of the
stick, the lift generated by the ends as they spin through the air, the differential
lift caused by the sticks motion through the air making the top of
the spinning stick go faster than the bottom, and the precession caused
by this uneven torque. A bunch of cool things all happening at the same time.
And not too distantly related to how a motorcycle turns.

This would make a nice Science In Action demo -- let's work out the physics and
then, noticing it's all independent of gravity, make a prediction about what happens
at zero-g. Then watch the video.


[User Picture]From: [info]sheilagh
Fri, 2-May-2008 6:11 PM (UTC)

Sounds about right.

(Link)

[User Picture]From: [info]solarbird
Thu, 1-May-2008 4:10 PM (UTC)

(Link)

Sokka of the Water Tribe is most pleased to hear of this news!

[User Picture]From: [info]elliterati
Fri, 2-May-2008 7:01 AM (UTC)

When the Space Battles finally come...

(Link)

...everyone will be using those razor boomerangs that kid in The Road Warrior had instead of guns. This guy's just warming up.