| Comments: |
It depends on how much musical experience he had before he started playing the piano. I'm more inclined towards the 10 years than the 4, what with the "no one dies on my day!" timesuck and the fact that he was a boor in the beginning of the movie.
I was going to argue with Between days #6 and #7, at least 100 days passed: the time to see the movie 100 times and say "couldn't he have watched it more than once per day?" and then I was like ... no. Dumb ass.
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/65755231/3756146) | From: _alexiscone Sun, 3-Feb-2008 2:23 PM (UTC)
This is great. Gracias. | (Link)
|
I didn't see it when it first came out, but I do believe the first time I saw this movie was when I was still a single-digit age. I watched it a lot as a kid.
The feel of the movie (to my elementary school self) always led me to think the day repeated for about two "normal-time" weeks and I took the amazing learning curve to be proof he was an exemplary person and viewed the comments about time as unrelated or an exaggeration for some reason.
I haven't watched it in years, so I'm going to now (it's on cable!) with this revelation that the lesson was much harder-learned... heh.
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/70477830/5548170) | From: nidea Sun, 3-Feb-2008 2:38 PM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
One of my favorite films.
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/881081/426916) | From: gargargar Sun, 3-Feb-2008 3:46 PM (UTC)
I got you babe | (Link)
|
My mother once told me that the choice of song for Phil to wake up to was likely a reference to the Vietnam war. It turns out that the only piece of popular culture that stayed more or less the same from the start of the draft to the bug-out was the Sonny and Cher show.
The opening theme was a comforting song for folks who desperately wanted things to be the same as they once were.
It could all be shit, but it seemed to give the film that extra bit of meaning for her.
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/71565582/7407158) | From: catullus_5 Sun, 3-Feb-2008 5:22 PM (UTC)
Re: I got you babe | (Link)
|
Yeah, I'd always suspected Groundhog Day was actually a Vietnam allegory....
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/68186387/1384473) | From: lafinjack Sun, 3-Feb-2008 6:09 PM (UTC)
Re: I got you babe | (Link)
|
Except Murray 'won' the movie.
He "won" by accepting that he could not always "win", so he had to let the homeless guy die, had to do without winning over the ungrateful kid, had to give up manipulating Andie McDowell, etc. before he is free to continue with what he can and should do.
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/71134260/1384473) | From: lafinjack Sun, 3-Feb-2008 6:12 PM (UTC)
Re: I got you babe | (Link)
|
I preferred the Smothers Brothers, who weren't content to stick their heads in the sand and sing "la la la".
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/881081/426916) | From: gargargar Sun, 3-Feb-2008 6:19 PM (UTC)
Re: I got you babe | (Link)
|
...well at least until they saw their shadows.
one of my favorite films, I watch it annually. Hence, everyone has linked/will be linking me to this.
This year I did an entire marathon of time loop films and TV episodes. (We finished with "Primer")
Next *weekend* for Feb 2nd is 2013.
We had a very similar thought while watching the movie. At casa del JWZ, we were unable to think of any other time loop films, but we did come up with many time loop episodes of television shows.
Please to be listing time loop films now.
There's... oh goddammit, what the hell was it called... started that one guy from "Weekend at Bernies"... AH HAH! 12:01! It's not as good as Groundhog Day.
sadly, the VHS copy I managed to find on half.com refuses to play.
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/56260827/10743742) | From: etfb Sun, 3-Feb-2008 10:38 PM (UTC)
Re: ayup | (Link)
|
Does Twelve Monkeys count? Depends on your definition I guess; it's not four years worth of one day, but there's some loopishness in there.
Memento isn't a time loop movie, but if it were it'd be a good one. Does that make sense?
Given the sheer sticking power of GHD, I'm surprised there weren't more copycats. I mean, The Blair Witch Project was popular so next year everything was on shakeycam; The Matrix did bullet time and suddenly it was impossible to have ballistics without Photoshop.
The first time loop movie that popped in my head was La Jetee, but Twelve Monkeys was kinda-sorta based on it, so same thing.
I think there were also about 97 episodes of the original Twilight Zone that fall into this category.
The Machinist is sort of a time loop movie, but mainly in Trevor's head.
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/16824320/2362150) | From: joel Sun, 3-Feb-2008 11:35 PM (UTC)
Re: ayup | (Link)
|
Not sure if they count, but these movies came to mind:
The Jacket (2005) Butterfly Effect (2004)
The Girl who Leapt through Time is a pretty canonical time loop film. But it's anime, which I'm not sure you meant. (It is a theatrical film, though, not TV or video.)
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/6443261/1246801) | From: dougo Mon, 4-Feb-2008 4:26 AM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/16824320/2362150) | From: joel Wed, 6-Feb-2008 12:41 AM (UTC)
dougo wins | (Link)
|
Great link, thanks!
Does that count? Technically it's a parallel timeline story, not a time loop story.
If it counts, then add Closing Doors to the list.
I'd consider the movie "Next" featuring Nicolas Cage a "time loop" movie, sort of...
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/71766431/1235120) | From: jesus_x Tue, 12-Feb-2008 7:43 AM (UTC)
Re: ayup | (Link)
|
I loved Primer. REALLY good movie.
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/5887295/515656) | From: jwz Tue, 12-Feb-2008 7:27 PM (UTC)
Re: ayup | (Link)
|
Eh. I was not as impressed by Primer as every other person who has ever written about it.
From: cranaic Tue, 12-Feb-2008 11:03 PM (UTC)
Re: ayup | (Link)
|
It's arguable that Donnie Darko is a time loop movie, at least if you take the FAQ at face value.
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/14812066/243833) | From: jope Sun, 3-Feb-2008 5:15 PM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
Clearly you have too much time on your hands! *snicker*
But didn't he also become a doctor and a marriage councilor (the young couple). Surely that takes a few more years than 4.
I also think that the "trying to make it stop" factor has to be taken in to account. I would imagine he would probably try to find a way out for at least a year or two before he settles down to using it to his advantage.
There is also the memorization of the background of every person in the cafe. He only has 24 (or is is 18?) hours to go from stranger to confidant. That would require a process similar to the courtship of Rita.
Oh great, now /I'm/ obsessing. And I thought I was done with this.
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/1600376/497361) | From: gfish Sun, 3-Feb-2008 6:21 PM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
Groundhogs in Canada are like Popes in Montana.
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/996772/447266) | From: ydna Sun, 3-Feb-2008 6:23 PM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
I just noticed that the piano teacher was very impressed (at the big party) with Phil's progress on the piano. How could she have been aware of his progress? Heh heh.
This is exactly what I have thought, there are other things in the 'final' day where it is not 100% clear that he would be a beloved fixture of the town by doing what he would have done on that day, but the piano teacher is the most obvious.
I think that he went up to the Piano teacher sometime during that day and said something like, "I'm a former student of yours for way back. Why don't you come watch me perform tonight?"
There's a new 15th Anniversary DVD that came out last week. It has a commentary from Ramis where he says that thing about the 10 years. Cite that, Wikipedia!
The sequel "Groundhog Day II: Groundhog Day".
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/53920674/8531) | From: headkandy Mon, 4-Feb-2008 7:22 PM (UTC)
One Burning Question and a few Observations | (Link)
|
I know that he tried once in the movie to stay up until 6 am, and just couldn't make it. Is there no way he could have just taken a nap and stayed up until 6am. Not once in 4 to 10 years? I mean come on.
For the record, I've watched this movie with my buddy (his favorite film) for the past 6 years on Groundhog Day, and we always discuss how much we love it, how Chris Elliot only has one good joke (about beastiality, no less, and it usually goes unnoticed "why would anyone steal a groundhog?" chris: "i can think of a few reasons." halarious.) And most of all how it shows man's ability to overcome obstacles in pursuit of poon.
Great flick everytime I watch it. But yeah, just stay awake, Phil.
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/5887295/515656) | From: jwz Mon, 4-Feb-2008 7:30 PM (UTC)
Re: One Burning Question and a few Observations | (Link)
|
More to the point, if he stays up until (almost) 6AM every night, does he wake up tired? Similarly, if he doesn't eat the day before, does he wake up hungry? I'm guessing no, and no, by the same mechanism by which he doesn't wake up burned up or otherwise dead: the magic resets everything, including his stomach contents and brain chemistry (excepting memories).
So in that case, he was actually able to utilize a full 24 hours of each day, making his N years be effectively 30% longer than N years would be in the real world.
Of course that's assuming that the events in the film are sequential. I've wondered lately if you could take a '21 Grams' approach to the temporal order and perhaps see some of the scenes and sections as overlapping one another, that at time we're seeing parts of the same day spread out across the film.
Except of course that is clearly not what was intended by Ramis & co so ...
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/48763642/5383937) | From: cryocone Tue, 5-Feb-2008 4:48 AM (UTC)
Nephew ate donut | (Link)
|
I love the idea that it was 10,000 years myself. That Phil is such a lecherous and sort of loathsome fellow that that's how long it takes. He's not crazy, or even stupid, simply so incredibly self-involved that it would take him 10,000 years to really figure out how to be a good person.
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/16824320/2362150) | From: joel Wed, 6-Feb-2008 12:40 AM (UTC)
Since nobody else bothered to post the link | (Link)
|
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/5887295/515656) | From: jwz Wed, 6-Feb-2008 4:22 AM (UTC)
Re: Since nobody else bothered to post the link | (Link)
|
Awesome, thanks!
From: santafedan Wed, 13-Feb-2008 9:21 PM (UTC)
Thanks to all the Ghog fans | (Link)
|
I've really enjoyed the various groundhog entries - you guys are a hoot. If you have any more related questions, I'm your guy. I'll check back here when I can, or you can always find me on the blogus groundhogus. Thanks jwz, and your loyal friends.
-- danny rubin | |