| Represent. |
[Wed, 1-Aug-2007 8:43 PM] |
|
|
|
| Comments: |
I saw that at the same time I was reading about the new features in C# 3.0, and thinking that it's getting more and more lisp-like with each rev.
Every once in a while I still fire up Basilisk to run Macintosh Common LISP. On a Core 2 Duo, it's approximately 12 gajillion times faster than it ever was on a 68040.
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/1938/4354) | From: spike Thu, 2-Aug-2007 4:17 AM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
*makes ( ) gang sign*
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/18155245/3574330) | From: remaker Thu, 2-Aug-2007 4:49 AM (UTC)
Wouldn't "represent-p" have been a more appropriate title? | (Link)
|
Sorry, I just remember that from the "split-p soup" joke.
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/47306834/900902) | From: debedb Thu, 2-Aug-2007 6:12 AM (UTC)
Actually... | (Link)
|
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/63908886/13368263) | From: fu3dotorg Thu, 2-Aug-2007 9:55 AM (UTC)
Re: Actually... | (Link)
|
Truly epic =]
I don't think there's anything elegant about the following: ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
you prefer }
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
} eh?
This might be the best known argument for Python.
It's not only elegant, it's worth making jokes about! "Plz read OP N try2," as the kids might say.
However, it's not like it's difficult or hard to read if you use a decent editor or even remotely sane dev.environment.
If you're going to be petty about the parens thing, try Haskell...
(f(g(h(i(j 1 2 3))))) is roughly equivalent to f . g . h . i . j 1 2 3
Haskell also has the lovely '$' operator for when you're currying functions, not just composing them. It basically funtions as a open paren that doesn't use a closing one.
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/66868633/33052) | From: ch Thu, 2-Aug-2007 7:12 AM (UTC)
I can feel it. | (Link)
|
The Fahlman approves.
You forgot to copy the "title" attribute, which is as much a part of the strip as each of the panels.
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/21139885/995384) | From: xach Thu, 2-Aug-2007 12:15 PM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
Come back, Shane!
Lisp users have children?
Luke, I be'est thy father..
I've very much enjoyed reading xkcd. The thing about the patterns in floor tiles - true. I reread the whole archive when I discovered I had been missing the additional commentary in the image's title attribute.
The title attribute thing annoys me because my stoopid browser truncates them.
That's fixed in Firefox 3 alpha builds, FWIW.
| |