| Comments: |
Looks more likely to house giant war robots inside its superstructure, but to each their own.
Beats SFMOMA which appears to have been inspired by lampreys.  
"Most elevators stop only at every third level, forcing employees to use stairs for part of the journey. To make the climb enticing, wide staircases march past collegial atriums and stop at protruding picture windows."
Wow, that sounds just so awesome if you have an injury or a mobility problem.
(Have admittedly become a bit more sensitive about architects who assume everyone's able-bodied since my Mum had her hip operation.)
TFA says there's at least 1 elevator that stops everywhere.
Oh that's not too bad, then.
(Of course, I still can't help but wonder what if it breaks?)
WE PUSH ALL THE CRIPPLES DOWN THE STAIRS AND LAUGH.
I'm pretty sure that's a policy somewhere =P
Do you have stairs in your house?
I fail to see the point of this question.
If you do not have stairs in your house, we may not be able to protect you.
That could also be solved with differently-phased banks. The trip through the lobby would be a disincentive for the abled to use elevators to move one or two floors. Reading the description of the floor-spanning elevator landings, though, that's not the approach they chose.
Oh, boy, I can't *wait* til I get to visit this building in my powerchair. Ten bucks says everybody is using the one "cripple" elevator instead of the stupid ones, thus the "working" elevator is that much more likely to break down.
Pretty much guaranteed, in my experience.
A better way to discourage elevator use is to have them go very slowly. That way it's faster to use the stairs.
My university discovered this trick a few years ago. I've found it works pretty well. Bonus points for having the elevator make lots of ominous grinding noises without anything serious actually being wrong with it.
I predict that within one year of opening, the modulo of one's floor will be a status symbol.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/75344120/466222) | From: ![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif) g_na
Tue, 1-May-2007 1:46 PM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
Where is it?
er, 6th & Mission. Y'know, the other 'M'.
yeah, y'know, the other 6th :)
Clearly, my mental map has gotten kerfliggered.
Hell I'd settle for staircases that aren't just glorified fire escapes. The stairwells in most buildings make you feel dirty inside.
Indeed, reasonable staircases seem more like a nudge. In this case they admit that they're forcing you to use stairs for at least part of the trip. Perhaps merely having fewer elevators would urge workers to use the centrally located stairs rather than wait for a crowded, out-of-the-way elevator.
Personally it's not the walking that bothers me, it's the unpleasant similarity of having to transfer between buses. I want to be able to pick one mode of transport and be able to follow it until I reach the end of my journey.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/5887295/515656) | From: jwz
Tue, 1-May-2007 11:10 PM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
I was told that I could listen to the radio at a reasonable volume from nine to eleven, I told Bill that if Sandra is going to listen to her headphones while she's filing then I should be able to listen to the radio while I'm collating so I don't see why I should have to turn down the radio because I enjoy listening at a reasonable volume from nine to eleven.
For the most part they have to be closed for fire reasons, so they don't act as a big chimney when there's a fire on a lower floor. And since people tend to avoid closed doors, there isn't much incentive to make them normally useful.
But the buildings where they lock the doors from the stairwell side on every floor except the ground are just dickish.
Every time I see that building I wonder how many people would be killed by flying glass if a truck bomb went off next to it.
Shamika showed up at practice and said to me, "Uh, I think I just saw Jamie outside taking pictures of the building?!?!?"
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/42441487/232194) | From: uke
Tue, 1-May-2007 5:11 PM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
Note that the structure on the top prevents helicopter landings.
For a while, every time I saw that, I thought "When are they going to take the scaffolding down?" But, then I realized it was permanent weirdness.
However, the encouragement to use stairs reminds me of the US Government in Snow Crash.
i love it too. i was a little skeptical at first but i've become totally enamored. i love the light up translucent boxes that stick off the sides. good stuff.
So true. I hadn't noticed how bad US architecture was until you mentioned this. Now you point it out, I've seen so much better in London, Paris and Helsinki. Making buildings for people or the environment or whatever seems to give architects a lot more imagination than just building more pyramid or masonic symbols, which seems to be the thing for so many US buildings.
Maybe the lifts should simply have a single button that randomly takes you to another floor. Kind of like an iLift shuffle, really.
thats a very cool building! i just moved to melbourne, australia and i'm hoping that i might get a job in ( this) building.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/88566593/383404) | From: buz
Mon, 2-Jul-2007 8:34 PM (UTC)
From the inside | (Link)
|
Looks like a large Faraday cage... | |
