| Comments: |
There was another article that mentioned that the voice will be a gender neutral child's voice. I'm not kidding.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/73180911/236883) | From: netik Fri, 20-Apr-2007 1:53 AM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
This reminds me of a Star Trek episode where they went to a planet run by a totalitarian government of little kids. Downright frightening.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/31928455/7599959) | From: mrmicks Fri, 20-Apr-2007 8:42 AM (UTC)
Its almost human | (Link)
|
The pilot scheme had the CCTV operator speaking into a microphone so it was their voice that came out. There wasn't any processing on the voice.
We've had a whole spin campaign here telling us how it is for the good of the public. Opposition has been trampled over using the "If you're not doing anything wrong then you've nothing to fear" argument. The operator they talked to on the TV mentioned getting groups of youths to break up and move on. As far as I'm aware there are no laws against hanging around with a group of friends.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/50866172/6115450) | From: sherbooke Mon, 23-Apr-2007 6:25 AM (UTC)
Re: Its almost human | (Link)
|
Yes, there are UK laws forbidding people to gather at certain times. Recently, I've seen official notices designating curfew areas, banning youths gathering together. It's something like an ASBO (Anti Social Behaviour Order) for a whole area. It's what you get when you the law is laid down by the Daily Mail. England prevails!
Ya know, when it comes down to 'for your own good' supression of civil liberties the English have us beat by a mile. Heck, even the patriot act is a knock kneed little sister to some of the British anti-terrorism laws.
Of course, I still think the only thing protecting us from actually being worse than the brits is our own incompetence.
Of course, I still think the only thing protecting us from actually being worse than the brits is our own incompetence. And laziness. Don't forget the laziness.
Not to mention Old Milwaukee.
Everyone knows good beer leads directly to authoritarian government.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/41137578/353803) | From: fo0bar Sat, 21-Apr-2007 11:44 PM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
Then what does Old Milwaukee lead to?
Everyone is lazy. Thats one of the few universals in this universe.
(and if you just look at annual hours of work the US averages around 100 more than the UK, but everyone is still lazy)
That's 'cause we're all slacking off at work and reading jwz.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/24718967/157487) | From: rainbrot Sat, 21-Apr-2007 2:31 AM (UTC)
Laziness | (Link)
|
He was going to mention the laziness, but decided it was too much trouble...
Yes and no. We are the world leaders on surveillance but I think you have us beat on police brutality and rough justice. I don't think you'd get away with a "Brian Haw"-type law in the US but overall I feel more scared about the US's slide into fascism than our own.
I'm trying to remember the title of a recent short story where a SKYNET-like AI is put in charge of Britain's CCTV system and becomes self-aware... it was in one of the Dozois Year's Best collections. Anyone remember the title?
You're probably thinking of "The Concrete Jungle" by Charles Stross ( read it online), which won the 2005 Hugo Award for Best Novella. It's available as part of a longer novel/compilation called "The Atrocity Archives" ( read an excerpt online). I highly recommend you get the compilation since it contains related stories. The author does a fine job creating a story that cleverly combines elements of hacker lore, Lovecraft mythology, crackpot conspiracy theories, 007 thrillers, political espionage tales, alternative histories, etc. Whereas many authors use cheap tricks similar to "Tachyon Particles" to avoid thinking things through, Stross did an excellent job architecting a complex pseudoscience and secret history that explains in great detail how and why the magic, monsters, organizations and such work. Anyway, it's a lot of fun.
I don't think that's it... there was something about how all AIs eventually expand to utilize the entire universe as computational substrate. Which comes up in Kurzweil's Singularity "non-fiction" book, also.
In the book I mentioned, demons from other dimensions and bad people are trying to take over the universe, not AIs, and one of their plots is to turn the CCTV system into a self-aware killing machine. So you're probably thinking about something else.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/4728476/455369) | From: crion Sat, 21-Apr-2007 2:38 AM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
Entertainingly enough, there's another story by Charles Stross called "Antibodies" (found in the collection _Toast_, among other places) that shows that an algorithmic moment of genius leads to AIs being able to invade all networks and eventually remove themselves from relying on the physical plane; It sounds like what you read.
Ah, yes, that was definitely it. TSOR found me the joking quote about Microsoft's software quality, and it was in Year's Best #18.
That story is brilliant. *puts atrocity on his amazon wishlist*
The talking camera is very THX 1138.
in the same that a tv screen would be if it could tell you to go and make it a cup of tea.
As far as I understand people are still at liberty to ignore the messages. So it will just annoy the people who have nothing to do with it. i guess that's the whole point.
and in Boston, they blow you up if you don't comply, labelling you a "suspicious package".
especially if you're extremely flat, and have lots of LEDs
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/79089804/2362150) | From: joel Thu, 19-Apr-2007 10:37 PM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
Or measure traffic.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/73180911/236883) | From: netik Fri, 20-Apr-2007 1:53 AM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
Only after we call you 'wikkid retharded.'
Oh, at last! The people of England has been waiting for a Big Brother to come for the last almost 60 years!
I notice something now that I didn't notice in 8th grade, when I read 1984.
George Orwell wasn't aware that you could have infrared (and other ranges outside the visible spectrum) cameras.
From: wdr1 Fri, 20-Apr-2007 2:50 AM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
I don't know if the DNA Lounge has security surveillance cameras, but if so, that's some deep irony.
I guess I will be canceling all possible trips I might make to England forever.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/50243102/10194558) | From: jmtd Fri, 20-Apr-2007 10:53 AM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
Yay!
You've probably never even left the US before. | |