jwz - Billboard Liberation! [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
jwz

  www.jwz.org
  userinfo
  archive
  rss

Links
[»| DNA (Log) (iCal) WebCollage (LJ) Mixtapes ]

Billboard Liberation! [Sat, 14-Apr-2007 5:55 PM]
Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry
[Tags|, ]
[music |Lush -- Leaves Me Cold]

Billboard ban in São Paulo angers advertisers

    [...which gets my vote for most shocking! headline of the year.]

The law is "a rare victory of the public interest over private, of order over disorder, aesthetics over ugliness, of cleanliness over trash," Roberto Pompeu de Toledo, a columnist and author of a history of São Paulo, wrote in the weekly newsmagazine Veja. "For once in life, all that is accustomed to coming out on top in Brazil has lost."

But advertising and business groups regard the legislation as injurious to society and an affront to their professions. They say that free expression will be inhibited, jobs will be lost and consumers will have less information on which to base purchasing decisions. They also argue that streets will be less safe at night with the loss of lighting from outdoor advertising.

"This is a radical law that damages the rules of a market economy and respect for the rule of law," said Marcel Solimeo, chief economist of the Commercial Association of São Paulo, which has 32,000 members. "We live in a consumer society and the essence of capitalism is the availability of information about products."

"What we are aiming for is a complete change of culture," said Roberto Tripoli, president of the City Council and one of the main sponsors of the legislation. "Yes, some people are going to have to pay a price. But things were out of hand and the population has made it clear it wants this."

Previously.

linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: [info]baconmonkey
Sun, 15-Apr-2007 1:01 AM (UTC)

(Link)

There is this new horrifying digi9tal billboard in Oakland, just as you get off the bridge. the thing is painfully bright. Worse than multiple sets of headlights on high-beam in your eyes.
oh how I wish it was not there.
[User Picture]From: [info]jwz
Sun, 15-Apr-2007 1:03 AM (UTC)

(Link)

If only you had some friends who lived in Oakland and were irresponsible with their use of firearms...
[User Picture]From: [info]baconmonkey
Sun, 15-Apr-2007 1:06 AM (UTC)

(Link)

Sadly this monstrosity is out in a roadless wasteland, in the area near the sewage treatment pland, and the oakland army base.
[User Picture]From: [info]madfire
Sun, 15-Apr-2007 7:54 AM (UTC)

(Link)

If only you had some army friends who lived in Oakland and were irresponsible with their use of rocket launchers...
[User Picture]From: [info]thegreatdoogie
Sun, 15-Apr-2007 1:11 AM (UTC)

(Link)

There's one in Detroit for one of the Casinos like that, full of flashing amber lights. If it was foggy/misty in the morning when I passed it, it would look like flashing police lights behind me. Scared the hell out of me nearly every morning for months, lol.

I never did understand how that could be legal when having a flashing license plate border or flashing neons inside would be illegal for being distracting to other drivers and/or making my vehicle appear to be an emergency vehicle.
(Replies frozen) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: [info]jwz
Mon, 16-Apr-2007 8:36 PM (UTC)

Re: Painfully Bright

(Link)

Wow, I really, really don't care.
(Replies frozen) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: [info]solarbird
Sun, 15-Apr-2007 4:01 AM (UTC)

(Link)

There's one of those on I-5. The billboard is on tribal land, so state laws on such things don't apply. CHRIST it's distracting and horrible.
(Replies frozen) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: [info]thegreatdoogie
Sun, 15-Apr-2007 1:11 AM (UTC)

(Link)

argue that streets will be less safe at night with the loss of lighting from outdoor advertising.

Now THAT'S stretching.....
[User Picture]From: [info]zetawoof
Sun, 15-Apr-2007 1:24 AM (UTC)

(Link)

Apparently the Brazilian advertisers have never heard of this high-tech thing called street lighting.
From: [info]catherineomega
Sun, 15-Apr-2007 6:50 PM (UTC)

(Link)

And they won't NOW, not without ads to tell them about it!
[User Picture]From: [info]fantasygoat
Sun, 15-Apr-2007 1:22 AM (UTC)

(Link)

How will consumers know about products?!

I wish the liberators would come here.
[User Picture]From: [info]chromebishop
Sun, 15-Apr-2007 2:04 AM (UTC)

(Link)

When I run for public office it will be on the "get rid of the fucking billboards" platform.

i despise.

though, flyering on telephone polls is ok.

its the size and the unavoidablilty of the giant ass billboards that really gets me fired up. at least we dont (yet) have those ones they have in LA that wrap around an entire 12 story building.
[User Picture]From: [info]skreidle
Mon, 16-Apr-2007 2:13 AM (UTC)

(Link)

If you make it into office, ideally without the use of roadside campaign signs, can you ban roadside campaign signs?
[User Picture]From: [info]pozorvlak
Mon, 16-Apr-2007 11:40 AM (UTC)

(Link)

Yeah, flyering on telephone poles is another kettle of fish entirely. No bright lights, and the barrier to entry is much lower, so you get actual new information from them: billboards are more often reminders of the existence of brands you've already heard of (ie, the ones that can afford billboards). Apart from this one.

I used to live in Prague, where the gig posters would get pasted over each other until they were hanging about nine inches off surface zero. Periodically someone would come around and remove the larger strata :-)
[User Picture]From: [info]wikkit42
Sun, 15-Apr-2007 4:04 AM (UTC)

(Link)

They missed a perfectly good chance to use the word "loglo".

Come the new year, this city of 11 million, overwhelmed by what the authorities call visual pollution, plans to press the "delete all" button and offer its residents unimpeded views of their surroundings.

How much of a hack do you need to be to make metaphors based on email?
[User Picture]From: [info]krick
Mon, 16-Apr-2007 8:46 PM (UTC)

(Link)

According to Wikipedia....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_(advertising)#Laws_limiting_billboards

Currently, four states -- Vermont, Alaska, Hawaii, and Maine -- have prohibited billboards.
[User Picture]From: [info]cattycritic
Mon, 16-Apr-2007 9:46 PM (UTC)

Sure is nice

(Link)

When I was in Ireland I noted the (general) lack of two things: HUGE HIGHWAYS, and billboards. Of course, Ireland is small, so doing without huge highways is probabaly a lot easier there.

It was really nice not having tall signs and billboards in the way of practically every view. Advertising outside was limited to small, street-sign size signs, signs right at a particular establishment, and in windows of stores.

Sure is a nice idea huh? While advertisers are fighting to get our attention on the surface of practically everything (public transit, taxis, checkout conveyor belts, floors of stores, overhead music, movies, blogs), some people are finally saying enough already.

I fully expect for someone to sell ad space on their children soon.
[User Picture]From: [info]balamuthia
Mon, 16-Apr-2007 10:40 PM (UTC)

Re: Sure is nice

(Link)


"I fully expect for someone to sell ad space on their children soon."

Between Gerber and McKids, people whore their kids out as advertising for free already.
[User Picture]From: positricity
Sun, 15-Apr-2007 6:09 AM (UTC)

(Link)

Definitely looks like a good thing. The sample billboards in the article are ginormous, and look like they would be utterly blinding at night.
[User Picture]From: [info]symbioid
Sun, 15-Apr-2007 6:38 AM (UTC)

(Link)

I don't think I'd call that which billboards portray "information". Noise, perhaps. Signal? Nope.
[User Picture]From: [info]curlyeric
Sun, 15-Apr-2007 10:16 AM (UTC)

(Link)

While I would love for billboards to go away for good I see several issues with this. They seem to be up for the sole purpose of reinforcing existing brands and recognition, nothing more.

They will get sued into oblivion by the advertisers. No matter what they implement they can basically guarantee a few million is losses from lawsuits. They basically say as much when he said "This is a radical law that damages the rules of a market economy and respect for the rule of law".

Advertisers are a tricky bunch and without billboards will switch to some other, more annoying, form of brand recognition. Trust me when I say whatever they replace it with *WILL* be more annoying. Maybe something like giving people $X/month to drive around with signs on their cars.
[User Picture]From: [info]phoenixredux
Sun, 15-Apr-2007 3:47 PM (UTC)

(Link)

I'm not certain that cars plastered with wrap-around ads are more annoying than billboards. Cars are part of the urban landscape, whereas billboards dominate it.

It strikes me that Sao Paulo isn't the only city grappling with this issue. It'll be interesting to see how this resolves itself.
[User Picture]From: [info]thegreatdoogie
Sun, 15-Apr-2007 7:42 PM (UTC)

(Link)

the problem with that is that "annoying" is purely subjective. Frankly, I've _never_ had a problem with billboards. It's just one of many things in this world I've learned to tune out for the most part. Some of them I've even enjoyed seeing, such as the ones advertising local restaurants when I'm out of town.
[User Picture]From: [info]skreidle
Mon, 16-Apr-2007 2:12 AM (UTC)

(Link)

Well, highway-side advertising for upcoming attractions/hotels/restaurants serve a purpose that's good for the consumers, too.
From: [info]legolas
Mon, 16-Apr-2007 8:38 PM (UTC)

(Link)

We have those were I live already (an special mini trucks with paid drivers that do nothing else than drive these around town on Saturday). What a waste of ... everything.
And they were looking to ban them but couldn't find a good way. And we have them in addition to the billboards. But you are right: they are more annoying.
From: [info]legolas
Mon, 16-Apr-2007 8:39 PM (UTC)

(Link)

*on special mini-trucks
[User Picture]From: [info]skreidle
Mon, 16-Apr-2007 2:17 AM (UTC)

(Link)

I think that I shall never see
A billboard lovely as a tree
Indeed, unless the billboards fall
I'll never see a tree at all

-- Shel Silverstein
[User Picture]From: [info]danfuzz
Mon, 16-Apr-2007 5:35 AM (UTC)

(Link)

ICYC, that poem's actually by Ogden Nash.
[User Picture]From: [info]skreidle
Mon, 16-Apr-2007 5:39 AM (UTC)

(Link)

[User Picture]From: [info]pozorvlak
Mon, 16-Apr-2007 11:32 AM (UTC)

(Link)

That is simply wonderful.

Hmmmm, I wonder if we could get that passed here...