| Comments: |
I know a gloomy gus that needs a huuUUUuug!
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/76241926/54143) | From: xinit Thu, 11-May-2006 10:50 PM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
From a heterosexual, female, potential life partner, right? If you're going to gay up the Internets, then the NSA will be on you in no time. Smile and wave at the smoke detector above your desk.... just in case.
If the NSA couldn't stop goatse it won't be able to withstand the onslaught of my ambiguous possibly-heterosexual pseudo-affectionate overtures ...
Regarding domestic spying, does that shit ever produce results that make it worth the effort?
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/51012350/236239) | From: harryh Thu, 11-May-2006 10:37 PM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
Of course!
We just can't tell you what those results are because it would compromise our future efforts. Just TRUST US.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/76241926/54143) | From: xinit Thu, 11-May-2006 10:52 PM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
Of course it produces results... accurate 87% of the time, plus or minus 83% nine times out of 10. The other times, well, we can't legally talk about them now, can we?
87% of the time?? Plus 83%?? EQUALS 170% for SUPER ACCURACY!! GO STEALTH! More stealth to stop things that never would have happened! Make good! Math hurts!
It's creating white collar jobs, this will lead to the trickle down effect and improve life for all citizens. Why do you hate America?
Why do you hate America?
That phrase is really annoyingly old.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/3905419/624907) | From: phil_g Fri, 12-May-2006 12:48 PM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
But think of the children!
dumped without papers somewhere in Albania left to fend for yourself That's bloody disgusting.
the National Security Agency refused to grant Justice Department lawyers security clearance One must question the story-logic of their not being a single Justice Department lawyer to speak of who could be granted the required security clearance.
Dammit, I meant to have text in there too. It's not just them. Nobody can get a clearance right now. They've suspended all background checks because their backlog is too big.
Wow, that's so lame. But at least you reminded me to add back fas.org to my readlist.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/76241926/54143) | From: xinit Thu, 11-May-2006 10:48 PM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
Isn't fighting oppresive government one of the things that caused that whole USA thing to spring up? The current US government would appear to be ever so much worse than the English one that was fought against in the Revolution, no?
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/41137578/353803) | From: fo0bar Thu, 11-May-2006 11:02 PM (UTC)
Oh yeah? Well... | (Link)
|
I'm going to go start my own republic! With blackjack! And hookers!
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/76241926/54143) | From: xinit Thu, 11-May-2006 11:06 PM (UTC)
Re: Oh yeah? Well... | (Link)
|
...but mostly the hookers...
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/16207016/749625) | From: pdx6 Thu, 11-May-2006 11:08 PM (UTC)
Re: Oh yeah? Well... | (Link)
|
We Americans call that "Nevada".
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/41137578/353803) | From: fo0bar Fri, 12-May-2006 3:05 AM (UTC)
Re: Oh yeah? Well... | (Link)
|
Which amusingly enough is a red state (but just barely).
The grim meathook future's so bright, I gotta wear grim meathook shades.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/71579301/7179655) | From: pshrst Fri, 12-May-2006 2:45 AM (UTC)
Why no happy meathook future? | (Link)
|
Google says:
Your search - "happy meathook future" - did not match any documents.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/69455905/1052779) | From: loosechanj Fri, 12-May-2006 2:55 PM (UTC)
Re: Why no happy meathook future? | (Link)
|
At least until this page gets indexed.
I just called T-Mobile's customer service, they have been briefed on this story, and say they did not provide info, and will only provide info with a valid warrant or subpoena.
Every other cell phone company is owned by a company that rolled over, with the possible exception of Sprint/Nextel, correct?
Yet another reason I'm glad I avoid baby bells.
Surely, all of this Constitution nonsense is an example of pre-9/11 thinking.
The Founding Fathers could not have imagined the concept of people with bombs.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/9624370/1571) | From: evan Fri, 12-May-2006 1:23 AM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/22555195/1249116) | From: 40hex Fri, 12-May-2006 1:51 AM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
"The government has abruptly ended an inquiry into the warrantless eavesdropping program because the National Security Agency refused to grant Justice Department lawyers security clearance"Lame beyond words. Declaring themselves above the law. They've used that dodge several times lately - avoided answering for their misdeeds by citing national security. telecart also raised the good point that they're talking about the Justice Department... surely they can find *someone* who can be trusted, there of all places? Verily, the U.S.A. is doomed. So's Australia given that we slavishly follow your every example :(
See, the problem is that people in the Justice Department care about justice (hardy har har, play along for a minute), and that's a direct threat to our national security.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/22555195/1249116) | From: 40hex Fri, 12-May-2006 3:58 AM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
The really sad thing?
That's true. Justice is not compatible with the US' self-declared aim of global domination... :(
You'll quit complaining when we put the ball gag in your mouth and start whipping you with a riding crop.
They'll have to do this overseas, the Republicans would never allow that sort of thing in America.
DUH, dominating yourself is retarded.
If you want to *REALLY* get scared about this subject, Google "dominionism." Roy Edroso is corrent when he says, "On the right, batshit-crazy is the new polyester."
I've been thinking, there's something called the Thomas Jefferson Bible. Thomas Jefferson made his own version of the Bible, simply using the words from the King James Version that were directly attributed to Jesus. He thought the words directly attributable to Jesus contained some of the best philosophy in the world. This brings me to the point I'm trying to make.
I've been thinking of writing a bit of a socio/political commentary/satire peice that I'm tenatively calling "The Pharocees' Bible". Basically, my goal who be to come up with a version of the Bible you would expect people like Fred Phelps, Pat Robertson, Neocons, and funny-mentalists to follow.
Maybe also parody the "Life Application Bible" by calling it the "Applied-To-Life Pharocee's Bible", and having "intepreation" and "insights" into what those passages "teach."
Maybe someone here can put me in touch with Al Franken? Or maybe Salman Rushdie? ;-)
You might want to consider calling it "The Pharisee's Bible" instead.
Well, I figure that if I write a book, it will probably be with something that has spell check. Yes, I realize you can spell check comments, I just didn't check the box that time.
so when does everyone say "No more. This stops now." Surely, that point has to be coming right? I'm going to be really disappointed if nothing happens before the end of his term. Really disappointed.
The thing is, most americans don't care. I'm reminded of the old saying about the citizens getting the government it deserves. | |