| Comments: |
I wonder if it's possible to do this by hand to a roach... I'm guessing that this "brain surgery" is probably not that precise. It would make a great trick to do at parties.
Of course, since graduating from college I haven't been at many parties with roaches crawling around. But still...
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/8652338/209486) | From: fg Sat, 4-Feb-2006 5:25 AM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
wow.
can I just point out that, in fact, roaches don't have brains? unlike vertebrates, who have one *primary* conglomeration of neruons which we call the "brain", roaches and other invertebrates have multiple ganglia (small groups of neurons sharing a relatively common purpose). also, cockroaches don't have much in the way of pain receptors, so they probably don't "care" all that much about their fate...
good post.
-- the parts that bugs me about the article is how he describes the probing the brain spot, and the riding of the roach by its antenna. Perhaps it's just a phrasing issue, but as they are they sound ridiculous.
∑ XahLee.org
So it's our as-always-rampant anthropomorphism* that makes this so frickin' abhorrent?
* God DAMN, I love that word
I prefer to make up words...
Anthropomorphocentrism would fit rather cleanly right into that place.
(Note: Presidents of the U.S.A. and jack-offs on LiveJournal have different standards of behavior)
Nah, "anthropomorphocentrism" would be a hangup on the practice of anthropomorphizing everything.
Which is certainly a valid hangup, but not really what's going on here.
What's going on here is a hangup on using man as the measure of all things--anthrocentrism--with anthropomorphism as a practical side effect of that hangup.
Anthropomorphocentrism is a great word, but not really applicable in this case.
that's so sweet of you to fix his typos.
This is one of the most repulsive things that I've read in a long time.
Coming from you, that's quite an endorsement.
It's "intelligence" design... in the hands of a bug.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/14065392/1300180) | From: gths Sat, 4-Feb-2006 6:34 AM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
This is both cool and unbelievably creepy.
Serves the fuckin roaches right, that's what I say. DIE, DIE, DIE YOU FUCKERS! SUFFER IN PAIN! HERE'S FOR EVERY NIGHT YOU WOKE ME UP RUNNING ACROSS MY FACE! HERE'S FOR EVERY TIME YOU RAN ACROSS MY FOOD IN THE KITCHEN! HERE'S FOR SIMPLY EXISTING!
Um, uh, sorry.
But roaches, I mean, they fucking deserve what they get, right?
That is so cool. This kind of stuff is why I went into biology. Zombie roach! If the wasps can do mind control it can't be long before we do it. Didn't someone borg roaches?
I'm just glad I got the wasp infestation out of my apartment before they did it to me!
Or maybe they did and I just don't realize it yet... (gulp)
From: holytramp Sat, 4-Feb-2006 8:12 AM (UTC)
tarantula hawk wasp | (Link)
|
Tarantula hawk wasp does something similar to tarantula. (Do no have a _good_ link, but google provides plenty of info)
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/83047239/2938311) | From: nelc Sat, 4-Feb-2006 1:54 PM (UTC)
Re: tarantula hawk wasp | (Link)
|
Nah, hawk moths just paralyse their prey, so they have to carry the thing back to their burrow themselves. Getting your prey to carry you is just so much more fiendishly elegant.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/27276650/6146006) | From: strspn Sun, 5-Feb-2006 3:48 AM (UTC)
Re: tarantula hawk wasp | (Link)
|
But millions of years of natural selection has allowed Ampulex to reverse engineer its host. We would do well to follow its lead, and gain the wisdom of parasites.
I'd rather not think about the full implications of that statement.
I think the full implication is that you can buy his book, The Wisdom of The Parasites, for $19.99 on Amazon.com.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/4546700/537707) | From: taffer Sat, 4-Feb-2006 3:23 PM (UTC)
Re: Maybe, no. | (Link)
|
Hahaha, that's got to be Dr. Phil's latest chart-topper.
I always find it amusing that the proponents of intelligent design seem to think the designer is benevolent.
All the evidence points to exactly the opposite conclusion. Starting from the lack of effective error-correction in the mitochondrial DNA and working down to things like this.
Yeah, see I was going to say something like that. Only you said it way better and with extra added SCIENCE!
Intelligent Design theory doesn't make any sense at all unless the designer is assumed to be in some way sadistic.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/50866172/6115450) | From: sherbooke Sat, 4-Feb-2006 2:43 PM (UTC)
Blake said it best... | (Link)
|
When the stars threw down their spears, And watered heaven with their tears, Did he smile his work to see? Did he who made the Lamb make thee?
Tyger! Tyger! burning bright In the forests of the night, What immortal hand or eye Dare frame thy fearful symmetry?
Intelligent design is proof the Gnostics were right. God's not really paying attention, and it was the Demiurge all along.
So there will be three things that survive a nuclear holocaust.. Snack foods, cockroaches, and the things that feed off of the roaches.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/54199834/5610889) | From: mopti Sat, 4-Feb-2006 12:21 PM (UTC)
The human equivalent | (Link)
|
Buying just enough beer to make the cutie you met in the bar docile and compliant while you have sex
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/29069753/6912786) | From: babbage Sat, 4-Feb-2006 3:20 PM (UTC)
Re: The human equivalent | (Link)
|
Docile and compliant? Who wants docile and compliant?
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/16862983/64168) | From: toastednut Sat, 4-Feb-2006 9:09 PM (UTC)
Re: The human equivalent | (Link)
|
timid men
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/12598889/1967957) | From: spudtater Sun, 5-Feb-2006 5:48 PM (UTC)
Re: The human equivalent | (Link)
|
Not really.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/93156837/64168) | From: toastednut Sun, 5-Feb-2006 6:22 PM (UTC)
Re: The human equivalent | (Link)
|
timid men in denial ;)
From: rsheridan6 Sat, 4-Feb-2006 1:04 PM (UTC)
Imagine this technology in the hands of the Republicans | (Link)
|
Michael Moore: All hail the glorious leader!
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/83047239/2938311) | From: nelc Sat, 4-Feb-2006 1:56 PM (UTC)
Re: Imagine this technology in the hands of the Republicans | (Link)
|
Do we need to imagine it? I mean, you saw all the blogging about Bush's radio control before the election, right?
That really is fascinating. I for one really appreciate posts like this....the interesting things life has to offer.
Yes, life has interesting things to offer..
Like having an insect stab you in the head and force you into her lair to feed her abhorrent progeny.
All part of the lord's wonderful plan for you.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/3977354/8064) | From: giles Sat, 4-Feb-2006 10:50 PM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
God, that was the best summer ever.
Why does this just make me think of anime where some monster can do this to schoolgirls with his penis?
I'd guess childhood trauma involving a penis and/or tentacles.
Awesome! That's way better on the sadistic scale than the tarantula wasp!
But if you want truly creepy, just look up Botflies or Screwflies.
(shudders)
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/88566593/383404) | From: buz Sun, 5-Feb-2006 5:09 PM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/40545178/8883146) | From: jkow Sun, 5-Feb-2006 10:53 PM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
Holy shit! Back to the Alien theory. Imagine some bug do that to a human. Crawl in his ear, sting somewhere and lead that man to its nest to lay its eggs in it...
Too creepy-a bug that can take the "will" away from its prey. No good can come from that. | |