| Comments: |
um... that's... dis_TUR_bing
thanks for sharing
}}}}shudder{{{{
Anyone else thinking of Planet of the Apes?
"Get your hands off me, you damn dirty human!"
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/54541970/2) | From: brad Fri, 6-Feb-2004 2:40 PM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
I so wish I knew the story behind that.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/59107796/353078) | From: greyhame Fri, 6-Feb-2004 3:00 PM (UTC)
Ask and ye shall receive | (Link)
|
Same thing I always say, I know a bunch of people into B&D and that doesn't bother (or interest) me a bit. But the plushies, they wig me out.
Okay. Now I officially hate you.
Does anyone know of a place where I can trade in my eyes on a pair that haven't seen this? I would really, really like to do that.
This is the internet, I'm sure you've seen worse. How about that japanese-kiddie-sex-doll stuff that JWZ found a while back? Surely that's worse.
I've changed my mind about this. Freaking people out like this is one of my personal favourite pass-times, so I applaud the artist for throwing me for a loop.
aah, you're like two weeks behind on this one jamie!
the thing that you may have missed if you just glanced at it before turning away in disgust is that the little girl has her hand on the older man's large, furry penis.
*shudder*.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/12238571/366114) | From: jette Fri, 6-Feb-2004 3:48 PM (UTC)
| (Link)
|
I wouldn't let a child of mine pose for that picture. I'm perfectly comfortable with the whole "naturist" concept, if they were an actual naked family playing volleyball it wouldn't be any big thing - but what's going on in that picture is waaay too squick, even though they are all in reality all covered up.
I guess that's the artist's point or whatever, but... where are that little girl's parents?!
oh god now you've found that image too! *retch*
hehe.
i dont really know why, but i think that picture was taken in the '70s :/
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/85553320/2114520) | From: slojae Fri, 6-Feb-2004 3:28 PM (UTC)
Re: | (Link)
|
could it be that instead of a bikiniwax she's got the full bush going on?... personally id say its much more recent than that... look at the shoes... though it does seem to be of and eastern european persiasion.. thats what i get anyways...
Now I have to gouge my eyeballs out with a letter opener. You've outdone yourself. This is far more disturbing than the Japanese exploring their sexuality.
From: devpreed Fri, 6-Feb-2004 4:35 PM (UTC)
I have now "suffer[ed] outrage, anger, embarrassment and serious injury." | (Link)
|
The best thing about this post was the topic
Not sure which is more disturbing, the image, or that you didn't caption it I, for one, welcome ...
And they say Janet's naughty.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/74632680/1042649) | From: j0ni Fri, 6-Feb-2004 4:44 PM (UTC)
mob hysteria | (Link)
|
Wow, you guys should all just chill the fuck out. This is hilarious, and it's challenging some of the pulpit bashers a bit, but it's funny. I love it. As for credentials, I have three kids, all girls, 2x2yrs, 1x6yrs, so I do know what it feels like to look at that picture if I had children of my own fuck you very much.
Plus, they all either have been or are pre-occupied with my genitals, because they're GIRLS and they don't have the slightest idea what's going on with them.
This is exactly what art is supposed to do. It reflects the bits you don't like to think about because they're uncomfortable, and it takes the piss out of prudes, and it turns the idea of nakedness on its head by wearing wool naked suits to stay warm, etc., etc.
I really am quite surprised how incredibly reactionary the comments have been.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/6670030/142871) | From: prema Sat, 7-Feb-2004 11:02 AM (UTC)
Re: mob hysteria | (Link)
|
well mostly its not the idea that the child is touching the genitals but possibly that the "father" in the photo may be getting off on it, seeing as the furry penis isnt exactly made to look flaccid. _That's_ the problem. I've had younger kids fascinated by women's bosoms, nothing knew. It's the adults reaction to it that is the issue.
were it not for the little girl grabbing her daddy's hoo-hoo i'd say this picture is not that disturbing really. I dont know why people are saying they need to "gouge out" their eyeballs. they're not REALLY naked, whats so horrendous then?
strange... yes. nowhere near most peoples idea of art...yes. horrendous and vulgar...not quite...
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/1142201/472904) | From: bifrosty2k Fri, 6-Feb-2004 4:56 PM (UTC)
soo behind the times :) | (Link)
|
This is like so 2 weeks ago...
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/6177047/848739) | From: deadmoose Fri, 6-Feb-2004 5:40 PM (UTC)
Re: soo behind the times :) | (Link)
|
Pointing that out is like so 12 posts ago...
i remember when i first saw this, i thought "why does he have chest hair in the shape of batman?"
What iz it maaan?
That is truly frightening.
In the current climate, I'd not be surprised if the Feds levied a child pr0n charge for that photo.See the news story I posted today (ganked from elsewhere, naturally)
::sighs at the ludcrity:: (making up words now, too)
I'm glad someone had the stones to post this directly rather than hiding it behind an lj-cut tag.
Heh. People still feel the need to sling shit when you dirty up their precious friends list.
oh, my brain. the pain, the pain.
I just got emailed a link to your journal and this entry. I demand my lunch back! | |